<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: HIFN – Commoditizing hash-based deduplication?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.aboutrestore.com/2008/10/17/hifn-%e2%80%93-commoditizing-hash-based-deduplication/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.aboutrestore.com/2008/10/17/hifn-%e2%80%93-commoditizing-hash-based-deduplication/</link>
	<description>Blogging about backup, recovery and marketing in the storage industry.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 14:42:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: JL</title>
		<link>http://www.aboutrestore.com/2008/10/17/hifn-%e2%80%93-commoditizing-hash-based-deduplication/comment-page-1/#comment-624</link>
		<dc:creator>JL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 15:53:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aboutrestore.com/?p=282#comment-624</guid>
		<description>SEPATON uses the HIFN compression card, and it works well.  The post refers to a newly announced card that combines hardware compression and hash-based deduplication.  The new card has the potential to commoditize hash-based deduplication which could negatively impact some vendors.  It will be interesting to see what happens.  (SEPATON&#039;s ContentAware approach does not rely on hashing and so the announcement does not impact us.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SEPATON uses the HIFN compression card, and it works well.  The post refers to a newly announced card that combines hardware compression and hash-based deduplication.  The new card has the potential to commoditize hash-based deduplication which could negatively impact some vendors.  It will be interesting to see what happens.  (SEPATON&#8217;s ContentAware approach does not rely on hashing and so the announcement does not impact us.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph von Meister</title>
		<link>http://www.aboutrestore.com/2008/10/17/hifn-%e2%80%93-commoditizing-hash-based-deduplication/comment-page-1/#comment-596</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph von Meister</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 18:29:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aboutrestore.com/?p=282#comment-596</guid>
		<description>Isn&#039;t Sepaton using HIFN&#039;s cards. What are the problems with the HIFN solution?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t Sepaton using HIFN&#8217;s cards. What are the problems with the HIFN solution?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic (Feed is rejected)
Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 1/6 queries in 0.004 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 361/362 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.aboutrestore.com @ 2012-02-07 20:34:24 -->
