<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SEPATON Versus Data Domain</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.aboutrestore.com/2009/04/17/sepaton-versus-data-domain/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.aboutrestore.com/2009/04/17/sepaton-versus-data-domain/</link>
	<description>Blogging about backup, recovery and marketing in the storage industry.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 16:25:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Livens</title>
		<link>http://www.aboutrestore.com/2009/04/17/sepaton-versus-data-domain/comment-page-1/#comment-3702</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Livens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 14:21:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aboutrestore.com/?p=495#comment-3702</guid>
		<description>Claire,

Thank you for your comment.  DeltaStor understands the objects contained within each backup set by looking at the metadata embedded within the backup data stream.  This happens transparently to the user and allows us to more effectively find redundancies.

Encryption randomizes the source data.  This makes deduplication difficult if not impossible because there are no consistent redundancies.  This situation impacts all deduplication algorithms, and your best bet is to disable encryption, if possible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Claire,</p>
<p>Thank you for your comment.  DeltaStor understands the objects contained within each backup set by looking at the metadata embedded within the backup data stream.  This happens transparently to the user and allows us to more effectively find redundancies.</p>
<p>Encryption randomizes the source data.  This makes deduplication difficult if not impossible because there are no consistent redundancies.  This situation impacts all deduplication algorithms, and your best bet is to disable encryption, if possible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Claire</title>
		<link>http://www.aboutrestore.com/2009/04/17/sepaton-versus-data-domain/comment-page-1/#comment-3548</link>
		<dc:creator>Claire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 01:21:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aboutrestore.com/?p=495#comment-3548</guid>
		<description>Jay,

I am new to deduplication but I heard from someone that the Delta Store product is superior to other deduplication because it knows and can understand what is in the backup set (and it can therefore do a better job of deduplication).

I am wondering how this happens, do you have some API&#039;s by which you can read the backup catalog or something. Second, I use encryption on my backup. Will Delta Store work with that.

Thanks,

Claire</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jay,</p>
<p>I am new to deduplication but I heard from someone that the Delta Store product is superior to other deduplication because it knows and can understand what is in the backup set (and it can therefore do a better job of deduplication).</p>
<p>I am wondering how this happens, do you have some API&#8217;s by which you can read the backup catalog or something. Second, I use encryption on my backup. Will Delta Store work with that.</p>
<p>Thanks,</p>
<p>Claire</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Livens</title>
		<link>http://www.aboutrestore.com/2009/04/17/sepaton-versus-data-domain/comment-page-1/#comment-1654</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Livens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 10:32:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aboutrestore.com/?p=495#comment-1654</guid>
		<description>Curtis,

It is my policy not to comment on unannounced products here on the blog.  Deduplicated reduplication is an important feature and I ask that you stay tuned for more details.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Curtis,</p>
<p>It is my policy not to comment on unannounced products here on the blog.  Deduplicated reduplication is an important feature and I ask that you stay tuned for more details.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: W. Curtis Preston</title>
		<link>http://www.aboutrestore.com/2009/04/17/sepaton-versus-data-domain/comment-page-1/#comment-1643</link>
		<dc:creator>W. Curtis Preston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 05:13:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aboutrestore.com/?p=495#comment-1643</guid>
		<description>You didn&#039;t mention the one thing that DD always does mention.  They have deduped replication and you don&#039;t yet.  It&#039;s kind of really important if somebody wants to go NOTAPES, isn&#039;t it?  When are we going to see you announce that yet?

I know; I&#039;m playing a broken record.  I&#039;m consistent, though.  I give DD a hard time for not having global (multi-node) dedupe.  I give EMC &amp; Quantum a hard time for their restore speed issue.  And I&#039;m giving you a hard time for not having deduped replication.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You didn&#8217;t mention the one thing that DD always does mention.  They have deduped replication and you don&#8217;t yet.  It&#8217;s kind of really important if somebody wants to go NOTAPES, isn&#8217;t it?  When are we going to see you announce that yet?</p>
<p>I know; I&#8217;m playing a broken record.  I&#8217;m consistent, though.  I give DD a hard time for not having global (multi-node) dedupe.  I give EMC &amp; Quantum a hard time for their restore speed issue.  And I&#8217;m giving you a hard time for not having deduped replication.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
