Archive for the ‘Backup’ Category
Wednesday, February 24th, 2010
The rumors of the demise of COPAN were rampant in late 2009. There was broad speculation that general operations had wound down and that the company was maintaining a skeletal staff. It was clear that COPAN's end was near and the management team was scrambling for an exit strategy. Most ...
Posted in Backup, Restore | No Comments »
Thursday, February 18th, 2010
This blog primarily focuses on protecting corporate data, but I recently received a call from my father that reminded me of the criticality of protecting personal data. My father called expressing frustration that his laptop hard drive had failed and corrupted his data. Fortunately, he had backup copies of his ...
Posted in Backup, Restore | No Comments »
Tuesday, January 26th, 2010
A recent tweet by Chris Mellor from The Register caught my eye. He highlighted IBM’s recent development of a 35TB tape. Here are four articles on the topic:
Engadget
FUJIFILM Announcement
The Register Article
A blog post by Robin Harris at ZDnet
My thoughts
It is interesting to see IBM/Fuji driving tape development. With this ...
Posted in Backup, Physical Tape, Restore | No Comments »
Monday, October 12th, 2009
The latest scary backup story comes from a firm called Danger that makes the Sidekick PDA/phone. The Sidekick stores the majority of its data in a central data center and the data is loaded each time to the phone is restarted. The idea is that the data center provides ...
Posted in Backup, Restore | No Comments »
Friday, August 14th, 2009
Chris Mellor (twitter:@Chris_Mellor) recently posted an article over at The Register about LTO-5 entitled Is LTO-5 the last harrah for tape?. He makes an interesting point about the future of LTO and whether LTO-5 will be the last generation of the technology. Most of the comments on the article disagree ...
Posted in Backup, D2D, Deduplication, Restore, Virtual Tape | 2 Comments »
Friday, May 15th, 2009
StorageMojo recently wrote a blog post discussing the results of a study by twinstrata comparing the costs and availability of Google apps and Microsoft Office/Exchange. The study showed that the Google apps were cheaper than MS Office/Exchange for a 20 person firm and the options were similar for a ...
Posted in Backup | No Comments »
Friday, May 1st, 2009
As I have posted before, IBM/Diligent requires Fibre Channel drives due to the highly I/O intensive nature of their deduplication algorithm. I recently came across a situation that provides an interesting lesson and an important data point for anyone considering IBM/Diligent technology.
A customer was backing up about 25 TB ...
Posted in Backup, Deduplication, Virtual Tape | No Comments »
Friday, April 17th, 2009
One of the questions I often get asked is “how do your products compare to Data Domain’s?” In my opinion, we really don’t compare because we play in different market segments. Data Domain’s strength is in the low-end of the market, think SMB/SME while SEPATON plays in the ...
Posted in Backup, Deduplication, Restore | 4 Comments »
Thursday, April 9th, 2009
W. Curtis Preston recently wrote an article on the state of physical tape for SearchDataBackup. He talks about the technologies that backup software vendors have created technology to more effectively stream tape drives. As I posted before, if you cannot stream your tape drives, their performance will decline ...
Posted in Backup, Deduplication, Restore | No Comments »
Wednesday, February 25th, 2009
Scott from EMC has challenged SEPATON’s advertised performance for backup, deduplication, and restore. As industry analyst, W. Curtis Preston so succinctly put it, “do you really want to start a ‘we have better performance than you’ blog war with one of the products that has clustered dedupe?” However, I wanted ...
Posted in Backup, Deduplication, Restore, Uncategorized, Virtual Tape | 4 Comments »